From: fraser@synopsys.its.a.joke.son.com
Subject: Re: Ada or C++ acting 'correctly' here?
Date: 1999/03/01
Date: 1999-03-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7bclov$drt$1@remarQ.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: hcaC2.5$r83.102@news12.ispnews.com
I nearly cried when w_s_m@g5.com said:
>With -W3, always a good idea, microsoft will give you an 'integral constant
>overflow' message on the expression. With -WX -W3 you could even say it
>behaves as well as the ADA compiler.
Until you replace the constants with a couple of variables, which will
send you off into hyperspace without a speck of complaint.
Mind you, this is only one amongst many reasons to choose Ada (ADA being
the American Dental Association or something, which you can choose as
well, but I'm not qualified to comment on that).
Fraser.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-27 0:00 Ada or C++ acting 'correctly' here? bill
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Steve Doiel
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
[not found] ` <36e8e201.48455851@netnews.worldnet.att.net>
1999-03-18 0:00 ` bglbv
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Claudius Proculus
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Biju Thomas
1999-02-28 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-28 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
1999-03-01 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Gautier.DeMontmollin
1999-02-27 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-28 0:00 ` William McKenzie
1999-03-01 0:00 ` fraser [this message]
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Hubert B. Keller
1999-02-28 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-02 0:00 ` Willliam V
1999-03-02 0:00 ` Pascal Obry
1999-03-02 0:00 ` Gautier.DeMontmollin
1999-03-02 0:00 ` kvisko
1999-03-02 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-03-02 0:00 ` SpamSpamSpam
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox