From: Kura <kuraitou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Upcasting interfaces with CPP convention in GNAT
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 14:13:05 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b6646b4-0bed-49b1-98ee-7f08670593efn@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1709521b-d44d-4a2e-8833-cb642e706954n@googlegroups.com>
I was able to work around the issue by using abstract tagged null records
instead of interfaces - no other changes necessary. It seems that interfaces
can only be at the very top of a hierarchy even if you're only extending
another interface.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-03 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-02 12:20 Upcasting interfaces with CPP convention in GNAT Kura
2023-11-02 14:11 ` J-P. Rosen
2023-11-02 15:08 ` Kura
2023-11-03 21:13 ` Kura [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox