From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Compiler implementation of speciallized needs annexes.
Date: 1999/02/25
Date: 1999-02-25T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7b47q2$cnd$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7b2mpq$194$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
In article <7b2mpq$194$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
dewar@gnat.com wrote:
> For one thing, it would be interesting to see if different
> compilers implementing Annex E could really communicate :-)
Are they supposed to be able to? That would indeed be very cool, but I didn't
get that impression reading the annex myself.
T.E.D.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-24 0:00 Compiler implementation of speciallized needs annexes Robert T. Sagris
1999-02-24 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-24 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-02-25 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` JP Thornley
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dennison [this message]
1999-02-26 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-03-02 0:00 ` dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox