From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Why both "with" and "use"?
Date: 1999/02/18
Date: 1999-02-18T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ai7p1$8kp$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7ahq7p$s6k$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
In article <7ahq7p$s6k$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
dennison@telepath.com wrote:
> A good point. But since named notation isn't used, you
> can't clearly see what in that scope is from what
> package. Without resorting to a cross-referencing
> tool you don't really know *how* the package is used,
> just roughly *where*.
"resorting" sounds like it must be hard work, but this need
not be the case, if you are using GNAT and EMACS, this is
a very easy operation
> With named notation a simple textual search through the
> source will suffice.
Not always, here is a little puzzle for the folks out in
CLA-land:
A unit contains:
x := Mumble (Q);
a search of the unit in which this statement appears shows
no other trace of the string Mumble, and no dreaded use
clauses.
How could this be?
> No fancy tool required. T.E.D.
>
> -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion
Network ==----------
> http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or
Start Your Own
>
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-18 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-13 0:00 Why both "with" and "use"? Mike Silva
1999-02-13 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1999-02-13 0:00 ` bill
1999-02-13 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-13 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1999-02-13 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-13 0:00 ` bill
1999-02-14 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1999-02-14 0:00 ` Bob Collins
1999-02-14 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1999-02-16 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1999-02-15 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-02-15 0:00 ` Ed Falis
1999-02-16 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-02-13 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1999-02-13 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-13 0:00 ` bill
1999-02-14 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-14 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-13 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-02-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-16 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1999-02-17 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-02-17 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-17 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1999-02-17 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-02-17 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-02-18 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-18 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-02-18 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-19 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-02-18 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-18 0:00 ` robert_dewar [this message]
1999-02-19 0:00 ` bourguet
1999-02-19 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-19 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-19 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-02-19 0:00 ` Brian Hanson
1999-02-19 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-19 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-23 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-02-19 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-19 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-19 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-19 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-19 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-19 0:00 ` Ada multiple string personalities. why so many? mike
1999-02-19 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-19 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-02-19 0:00 ` Mike Silva
1999-02-22 0:00 ` Brian Hanson
1999-02-17 0:00 ` Why both "with" and "use"? Matthew Heaney
1999-02-13 0:00 ` mike
1999-02-15 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox