From: kirk@NOSPAM
Subject: Re: Library Level Question
Date: 1999/02/15
Date: 1999-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7aam8p$g7i@drn.newsguy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 36c8d860.0@news.pacifier.com
In article <36c8d860.0@news.pacifier.com>, "Steve says...
>
>>But if we have a package inside another, like this:
>>
>>package Book is
>>
>> package Diagram is
>>
>> ...
>> end Diagram;
>>
>>...
>>end Book;
>>
>>
>>then the inner package is _not_ at library level. The diagram is in the
>>book, not the library.
>>
>
>Thank you, I believe the concept of library level is clear to me now.
>
>If I understand correctly, your example is in slight error in that package
>Diagram is at the library level, but its contents are not.
>
huh?
package diagram is NOT at library level. That is the whole point of
the example!
Kirk.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-15 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-15 0:00 Library Level Question Steve Doiel
1999-02-15 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-02-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-02-15 0:00 ` Steve Doiel
1999-02-15 0:00 ` kirk [this message]
1999-02-16 0:00 ` Steve Doiel
1999-02-23 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-03-08 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox