* Re: Justifying Development tools
[not found] ` <7aa64c$m32$1@cascade.cs.ubc.ca>
@ 1999-02-15 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1999-03-06 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pat Rogers @ 1999-02-15 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Donald Gillies wrote in message <7aa64c$m32$1@cascade.cs.ubc.ca>...
>>In article <36c85659.0@news.pacifier.com>, "Steve Doiel"
>><nospam_steved@pacifier.com> wrote:
>
>>> If you're really interested in things like the cost of errors and
the cost
>>> after shipment,
>>> read the paper by Stephen F. Zeigler, Ph.D. comparing the cost of
Ada and C
>>> development
>>>
>>>
http://www.rational.com/sitewide/support/whitepapers/dynamic.jtmpl?doc
_key=337
>
>IMHO, this article is spam science.
>
>You don't run a retroactive experiment with 7 variables and then try
>to correct for each variable independently, using ad-hoc ideas. A
>good experiment has a "design" with just one or two variables and all
>other things are held constant.
>
>A good experiment is designed using something called "statistics"
>which seems completely unfathomable to the average software
>engineering computer scientist. In particular, without looking at
>confidence intervals and many indepedent trials (does this guy
>understand what is the meaning of "independent trials" ???), you are
>doing nothing but promoting heresay, and we have enough newspapermen
>in the country doing this already...
What experiment are you referring to? My recollection is that the
author makes conclusions based upon historical data.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Justifying Development tools
1999-02-15 0:00 ` Justifying Development tools Pat Rogers
@ 1999-03-06 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Corey Ashford @ 1999-03-06 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
Pat Rogers wrote:
>
> Donald Gillies wrote in message <7aa64c$m32$1@cascade.cs.ubc.ca>...
> >>In article <36c85659.0@news.pacifier.com>, "Steve Doiel"
> >><nospam_steved@pacifier.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> If you're really interested in things like the cost of errors and
> the cost
> >>> after shipment,
> >>> read the paper by Stephen F. Zeigler, Ph.D. comparing the cost of
> Ada and C
> >>> development
> >>>
> >>>
> http://www.rational.com/sitewide/support/whitepapers/dynamic.jtmpl?doc
> _key=337
> >
[snip]
Just as a side note, the link shown above is outdated. Here's a current
one:
http://www.rational.com/sitewide/support/whitepapers/dynamic.jtmpl?doc_key=337&borschtid=36402077701901701421
- Corey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1999-03-06 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <01be5860$b1b0a0c0$32f23ccf@LittleFoot>
[not found] ` <36c85659.0@news.pacifier.com>
[not found] ` <gwinn-1502991649500001@209-122-231-125.s125.tnt4.sbo.erols.com>
[not found] ` <7aa64c$m32$1@cascade.cs.ubc.ca>
1999-02-15 0:00 ` Justifying Development tools Pat Rogers
1999-03-06 0:00 ` Corey Ashford
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox