Selective suppression of warnings --- gnat on GNU/Linux

[Michael Mounteney <gate02@landcroft.co.uk>]

Hello, I am trying to build an application of which some of the source
is automatically translated from Pascal, on the fly.  The problem is
that the automatically-translated source is causing a lot of spurious
warnings about declarations not being used.  This is because the
Pascal code has many instances of:

     type
          somerange = 1..10;
          somestruct = record ... end;

which is translated into Ada as

     type somerange is new integer range 1 .. 10;

     type somestruct is record ... end record;

but the problem is that any operators such as + and = are not visible
in other units.  The solution to that is to rename the operators in
the client units, thus:

     with stage3;    -- contains definitions of somerange, somestruct
etc.

     package body myusage is

          function "=" (L, R : in stage3.somestruct) return Boolean
renames stage3."=";
          function "+" (L, R : in stage3.somerange) return
stage3.somerange renames stage3."+";
          ..........
     end myusage;

without those renamings, any usage of = and + within the body of
myusage are flagged as errors owing to lack of visibility/
qualification.

The translator is a rather crude line-by-line affair written in
Haskell that only performs partial analysis of the source, and
certainly isn't up to identifying the arguments to operators within
expressions.  Thus, it produces the renaming clauses if it encounters
the type name is the source;  e.g., if it sees somerange, it outputs
all the renamings for somerange.  However, the renamings usually are
not required, so gnat warns about them.  Normally, this would not be a
problem;  one would simply remove the unneeded declaration from the
source.  I did try putting the declarations into another package and
then "with" and "use" that, but then the warning changes to "no
declarations used from the package".

I really really really don't like "use" anyway and prefer always to
qualify imported names.

What I'd like is a pragma that switches-off and switches-on the
warning over the specific range of lines containing the renamings, but
no such seems to be available.  I don't want to switch off the warning
from the command line as that will suppress valid warnings.

Is there another way ?  Is there some rearrangement of the source that
WOULD suppress the unwanted warnings.

So the question: