From: "Alexy V Khrabrov" <khrabrov.a@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Re: MI for Ada
Date: 1999/02/13
Date: 1999-02-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a2j8q$meo@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EACHUS.99Feb12142926@spectre.mitre.org
Robert I. Eachus wrote [an unspeakable blasphemy in 1983] in his message:
> It would be a very useful extension to the language. Any one want
>to work out the details of the semantics, then add it to gnat as a
>language extension? I suspect that taking it that far is not too much
It's just amazing how a strict monastery whose charter is LRM can get soft
during Clinton's administration! :-)) That's what governmental affiliation
does even to the creme-de-la-creme sect of the Ada gurus! No wonder the
Standard and ACVC were a part of Reaganomics... Nah, nothing's clear in
these times... OOPs/ShmOOPs... :-))) MS Projects taking over people's
lives, malicious MS Objects COMmunicating with Ketzalkoatl, their master and
protector... Brrrr... Still, Clinton/Java is better than Reagan/Ada! Sad
but true, you may not be a programmer, but have to be a citizen.
Cheers,
Alexy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-11 0:00 MI for Ada Brian Rogoff
1999-02-11 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-12 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-02-12 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-02-13 0:00 ` Alexy V Khrabrov [this message]
1999-02-14 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-02-15 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-18 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-02-16 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-02-16 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-16 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-02-17 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox