From: "Brian" <phaedrusalt@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ada as a first language
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:02:21 -0900
Date: 2009-03-23T13:02:21-09:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7NadnVUQy9Nzm1XUnZ2dnUVZ_geWnZ2d@earthlink.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87r60oip8a.fsf@nbi.dk
"Jacob Sparre Andersen" <sparre@nbi.dk> wrote in message
news:87r60oip8a.fsf@nbi.dk...
> Considering the papers I have read comparing how engineering students
> succeed in implementing embedded systems in Ada and C, I disagree.
>
> There is of course the difference that the students most likely got
> their development system served on a silver platter. You may want to
> see if you can get information on what they have been working with.
> (Asking John W. McCormick might be the easy way to get the
> information.)
Hmmm, with no consideration of the scope, size, and complexity of the
problem space that Chris is trying to tackle, you disagree? So, you truly
believe that Ada is a better language, no matter what he is trying to
achieve? For any size project? (The Ada Kool-Aid claims another victim!)
This is one of the items that, I believe, has lead to some disillusionment
with Ada. It isn't the perfect tool for every situation, embedded or not.
And we should stop saying that it is, the language and it's proponents are
losing credibility.
When someone asks us for advice like this, we should consider it from an
engineering perspective. What's the right tool to use? The one that gets
the job done, for the right amount of manpower, time and money. Just as I
wouldn't recommend that Chris use COBOL for his hobby work, I would expect
that the learning curve for Ada would hamper his work. Since hobbyist,
beginner code tends to be small (Less than 1K SLOC/project, and usually much
smaller), then other languages might tend to give him more success with less
pain.
With all due respect to Mr McCormick, his "Why Ada succeeds where C fails"
should be changed to "Why Ada succeeds where C fails for this hardware and
these software requirements relating to driving a model railroad". While my
version lacks snappy prose, the accuracy is much improved. Otherwise,
people might assume that he is saying Ada is superior to C (Or other
languages) for every situation, which is just plain silly.
Brian Salter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-23 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-22 2:26 Ada as a first language Chris
2009-03-22 10:36 ` mockturtle
2009-03-22 14:44 ` Brian Drummond
2009-03-23 11:03 ` Peter C. Chapin
2009-03-23 13:29 ` Brian Drummond
2009-03-25 10:51 ` Peter C. Chapin
2009-03-23 16:59 ` rolf.ebert_nospam_
2009-03-24 19:22 ` Tim Rowe
2009-04-04 1:42 ` Brian Gaffney
2009-04-07 9:50 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2009-03-22 15:21 ` Gary Scott
2009-03-23 8:28 ` Brian
2009-03-23 9:05 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2009-03-23 22:02 ` Brian [this message]
2009-03-24 1:41 ` Gautier
2009-03-24 5:56 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2009-03-24 22:30 ` Brian
2009-03-25 9:41 ` rmoldskr+usenet
2009-03-25 22:27 ` Brian
2009-03-25 17:58 ` John McCormick
2009-03-25 23:20 ` Brian
2009-03-23 12:08 ` Chris
2009-03-25 21:10 ` John McCormick
2009-04-11 16:40 ` Mike Silva
2009-03-23 23:05 ` jpwoodruff
2009-03-25 0:16 ` Martin
2009-03-25 15:54 ` John McCormick
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-07-03 0:00 Ada as a First Language RC
1997-07-03 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1997-07-06 0:00 ` Alan Brain
1997-07-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-07-16 0:00 ` Eric James DeArment
1997-07-07 0:00 ` Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
1992-12-29 15:40 agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!vx9000.weber.edu!
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox