From: "Mark Lundquist" <no.spam@getalife.com>
Subject: Re: Assertions in the Next Ada Standard
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2002 23:16:19 GMT
Date: 2002-01-14T23:16:19+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7FJ08.24446$Vq.221621@rwcrnsc53> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3C3FE630.BDB27416@adaworks.com
"Richard Riehle" <richard@adaworks.com> wrote in message
news:3C3FE630.BDB27416@adaworks.com...
<[..snip..]
> The fact that there is very little demand for assertions might be said
> of other seldom used and little understood features already in the
language.
Good point.
>
> I would like to see us engage in dialogue about this idea in terms of
> its intrinsic merits and and potential for harm rather than depend on the
> immediate demand of the day-to-day current Ada practitioner.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-14 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-11 6:20 Assertions in the Next Ada Standard Richard Riehle
2002-01-11 9:23 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-01-11 13:47 ` Robert A Duff
2002-01-11 23:28 ` Nick Roberts
2002-01-12 1:30 ` Darren New
2002-01-11 20:07 ` FGD
2002-01-11 20:39 ` Wes Groleau
2002-01-12 4:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-12 7:30 ` Richard Riehle
2002-01-12 19:58 ` FGD
2002-01-12 21:27 ` Ed Falis
2002-01-12 22:45 ` Darren New
2002-01-14 17:20 ` Robert A Duff
2002-01-14 17:42 ` Darren New
2002-01-14 23:16 ` Mark Lundquist [this message]
2002-01-17 6:23 ` Richard Riehle
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox