From: "Björn Persson" <spam-away@nowhere.nil>
Subject: Re: Why can't I override these functions?
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 19:38:43 GMT
Date: 2004-05-07T19:38:43+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7BRmc.58437$mU6.237336@newsb.telia.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7gl9v$k37$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> Björn Persson <spam-away@nowhere.nil> wrote:
>
> : extracted-discrete_parameters.ads:19:09: type must be declared abstract
> : or "Meaning" overridden
>
> FWIW, two things remove the complaint:
> 1/ removing private-ness
Hmm, yes. And I only have to remove private-ness in the parent package.
How odd. (As if the whole thing weren't extremely odd already.)
I want to avoid that of course. I would rather eliminate
Intermediate_Definition and derive directly from Parameter_Definition
(which also removes the complaint). It would increase code duplication,
but that's preferrable to making things public that should be private.
> 2/ inserting the child unit after Common_Functions as a subpackage
Well, I can do that only if I also remove private-ness, since
Discrete_Parameters must be publicly visible.
Thanks anyway.
--
Björn Persson
jor ers @sv ge.
b n_p son eri nu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-07 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-07 10:43 Why can't I override these functions? Björn Persson
2004-05-07 17:15 ` Jim Rogers
2004-05-07 18:15 ` Björn Persson
2004-05-07 18:42 ` Georg Bauhaus
2004-05-07 19:38 ` Björn Persson [this message]
2004-05-08 6:15 ` Martin Krischik
2004-05-09 12:42 ` Björn Persson
2004-05-08 11:34 ` Simon Wright
2004-05-09 12:38 ` Björn Persson
2004-05-10 5:43 ` Simon Wright
2004-05-10 11:49 ` Martin Dowie
2004-05-10 12:13 ` Björn Persson
2004-05-13 7:23 ` Björn Persson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox