From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Looking for implementation idea
Date: 1999/02/08
Date: 1999-02-08T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <79ld2d$s1d$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m2r9s1hpn8.fsf@wf-rch.cirr.com
In article <m2r9s1hpn8.fsf@wf-rch.cirr.com>,
minyard@acm.org wrote:
> So should I now put spin-locks in all my protected type
> operations so they will provide mutex on SMP machines (if
> mutex is what I am looking for, which I expect is their
> most common use)?
This seems very confused, spin-locks if needed are part of
the *implementation* of protected types, not something you
need to worry about as a programmer.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-07 0:00 Looking for implementation idea Thomas Handler
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Niklas Holsti
1999-02-08 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
1999-02-09 0:00 ` Niklas Holsti
1999-02-10 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1999-02-08 0:00 ` robert_dewar [this message]
1999-02-08 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1999-02-08 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-08 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-08 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-09 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-11 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-02-08 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-08 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-08 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Corey Minyard
1999-02-08 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
1999-02-07 0:00 ` Paul Duquennoy
1999-02-08 0:00 ` Thomas Handler
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox