From: Charly <carl.weierstrass@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: bug or feature
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 11:07:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2014-09-08T11:07:28-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <79a52a0d-df2c-464f-b5f4-c1be76a0f536@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <858ulu1orl.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
Am Montag, 8. September 2014 10:48:42 UTC+2 schrieb Stephen Leake:
> Dirk Heinrichs writes:
>
>
>
> > Charly wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> [...] because of the subtype definition in line 6.
>
> >
>
> > Shouldn't this be renames instead?
>
>
>
> You can't use 'rename' on a type, only on an object. In most cases,
>
> 'subtype' is a good way to rename a type. But not in this case.
>
>
>
> --
>
> -- Stephe
Why not in this case?
I've used 'subtype' in terms of 'renames' in many situations as I did in line 7 of my example program and never got this strange message.
------
Charly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-08 18:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-07 10:33 bug or feature Charly
2014-09-07 16:59 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2014-09-08 8:48 ` Stephen Leake
2014-09-08 18:07 ` Charly [this message]
2014-09-09 4:32 ` Stephen Leake
2014-09-09 4:39 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2014-09-08 8:51 ` Stephen Leake
2014-09-08 9:09 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-09-08 15:31 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-09-08 9:43 ` Simon Wright
2014-09-09 4:40 ` Stephen Leake
2014-10-06 17:48 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox