From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: tasking in Ada and Annex D question
Date: 1999/02/02
Date: 1999-02-02T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7963h1$a6h$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 793jl9$hf@drn.newsguy.com
In article <793jl9$hf@drn.newsguy.com>,
nabbasi@earthlink.net wrote:
> 1. How could FSU be an Annex D compliant, if one thread
> will block the other like this? (even though one will
> expect that doing an IO message will cause a task to
> yield the CPU).
Annex D requires run till blocked semantics, and forbids
any kind of time slicing.
You say that you "expect" that doing an IO message will
cause a task to yield the CPU.
You can expect anything you like, but you read no such
requirement in the RM, because there is no such
requirement!
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-02 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-31 0:00 tasking in Ada and Annex D question nabbasi
1999-02-01 0:00 ` Dr. Hubert B. Keller
1999-02-02 0:00 ` robert_dewar [this message]
1999-02-02 0:00 ` Roger Racine
1999-02-02 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-03 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1999-02-03 0:00 ` Frank Mueller
1999-02-03 0:00 ` Frank Mueller
1999-02-03 0:00 ` Roger Racine
1999-02-03 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-02-02 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
1999-02-02 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-02 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
1999-02-02 0:00 ` Niklas Holsti
1999-02-03 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
1999-02-03 0:00 ` robert_dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox