From: NiGHTS <nights@unku.us>
Subject: Re: Using the "Terminated" aspect for a task passed to a generic
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2018 10:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2018-04-23T10:18:41-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7935e886-41da-4353-94cf-bb5db79d18b4@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2cc5db4-1abf-4a4c-92ed-089e0e7d6d21@googlegroups.com>
Thank you all for your help. These are some really interesting ideas.
I was thinking about my problem out-of-the-box and felt it would be an effective implementation to make a package including a task interface rather than a generic package passing a task. I realized that the task probably should not be defined separately from the WD package and should instead be part of the same inherited package.
To simplify code organization is in itself a bug fix.
I appreciate your quick responses and I have learned a few things as well. Thank you again!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-23 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-23 14:20 Using the "Terminated" aspect for a task passed to a generic NiGHTS
2018-04-23 15:40 ` AdaMagica
2018-04-23 16:23 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2018-04-23 16:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-04-23 16:35 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-04-23 16:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-04-23 17:04 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-04-23 17:18 ` NiGHTS [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox