comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Free/Cheap Ada compilers
@ 1991-03-28 18:06 Richard Pattis
  1991-03-29 21:37 ` George C. Harrison, Norfolk State University
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Pattis @ 1991-03-28 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)


The following is an excerpt from a comp.lang.misc post by Barry Shein (in
which he analyzes C, FORTRAN, Pascal, Ada, Scheme, and C++ for use in
teaching).  Whether this post is accurate or not, I think it clearly states
common perceptions about Ada.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. ADA - Few compilers, mostly too expensive for academics to ever
own, few books oriented towards CS, very demanding on the computing
resources (usually precipitating battles between the people who teach
and those who run the computers as the intro class makes the system
unusable), oh well.

DOD et al blew it with ADA by not making ADA environments available
(thru grants etc) to educators. Right now it's mostly non-existent in
academia, and the few faculty I know who insisted on teaching with ADA
had to be heroes with raising money to support their courses.

So its suitability as a teaching language is mostly moot, you don't
own it, and you can't afford it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rich

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Free/Cheap Ada compilers
  1991-03-28 18:06 Free/Cheap Ada compilers Richard Pattis
@ 1991-03-29 21:37 ` George C. Harrison, Norfolk State University
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: George C. Harrison, Norfolk State University @ 1991-03-29 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)


In article <15585@june.cs.washington.edu>, pattis@cs.washington.edu (Richard Pattis) writes:
> The following is an excerpt from a comp.lang.misc post by Barry Shein (in
> which he analyzes C, FORTRAN, Pascal, Ada, Scheme, and C++ for use in
> teaching).  Whether this post is accurate or not, I think it clearly states
> common perceptions about Ada.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 4. ADA - Few compilers, mostly too expensive for academics to ever
> own, few books oriented towards CS, very demanding on the computing
> resources (usually precipitating battles between the people who teach
> and those who run the computers as the intro class makes the system
> unusable), oh well.
> 
> DOD et al blew it with ADA by not making ADA environments available
> (thru grants etc) to educators. Right now it's mostly non-existent in
> academia, and the few faculty I know who insisted on teaching with ADA
> had to be heroes with raising money to support their courses.
> 
> So its suitability as a teaching language is mostly moot, you don't
> own it, and you can't afford it.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Rich
This is sad - and apparently written from the viewpoint of total ignorance. 
Rich, if did not post a follup, I will.  Maybe I will anyway.  
 
And since when did the American Dental Association have a compiler?

I will not post my fustration on here....

George

-- George C. Harrison                              -----------------------
----- Professor of Computer Science                -----------------------
----- Norfolk State University                     -----------------------
----- 2401 Corprew Avenue, Norfolk, Virginia 23504 -----------------------
----- INTERNET:  g_harrison@vger.nsu.edu ---------------------------------

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1991-03-29 21:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1991-03-28 18:06 Free/Cheap Ada compilers Richard Pattis
1991-03-29 21:37 ` George C. Harrison, Norfolk State University

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox