From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Ada 83 Pointers question
Date: 1999/01/21
Date: 1999-01-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <78800j$3o2$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 787fcm$k03$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
In article <787fcm$k03$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> In article <36A658CA.97438B6@cacd.rockwell.com>,
> aalowe@cacd.rockwell.com wrote:
> > Now since we are safety critical, we have been forbidden
> > from using a new clause and since the 'Access does not
> > exist yet, the engineer created a unchecked conversion to
> > go between a System.Address and a boolean pointer. Thus
> > when the 'snapshot' is created, it then references the
> > boolean pointer element to the array of the record to the
> > 'Address of the boolean component. Whew!
>
> "Since we are safety critical, we have been forbidden from
> doing this in the safe and reliable way, and have instead
> rigged up a highly non-portable unsafe way of doing things
> that may or may not work, but it seems to work OK, so we
> guess it's OK, though it leaves us feeling uncomfortable".
That's a good point. Take a close look at the actual requirements you have.
Its possible that only UNCHECKED_DEALLOCATION is prohibited. That would make
allocators just fine, as long as you only use a limited amount of them.
T.E.D.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-01-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-20 0:00 Ada 83 Pointers question Lowe Anthony A
1999-01-21 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-01-21 0:00 ` dennison [this message]
1999-01-21 0:00 ` dennison
1999-01-21 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
1999-01-21 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox