From: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com
Subject: Re: Valued procedures
Date: 1999/01/21
Date: 1999-01-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <787oj6$sju$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 786pfu$1vb$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
In article <786pfu$1vb$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
dmitry6243@my-dejanews.com wrote:
>
> Further, I believe it should be possible to ignore the
> result of a procedure.
Anyone can believe anything they like :-)
But this proposal is clearly at odds with the design goals
of Ada and would not have a ghost's chance of winning
approval!
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-01-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-21 0:00 Valued procedures dmitry6243
1999-01-21 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-01-21 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-01-21 0:00 ` adam
1999-01-22 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-01-22 0:00 ` adam
1999-01-21 0:00 ` dennison
1999-01-21 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-01-21 0:00 ` dennison
1999-01-25 0:00 ` dmitry6243
1999-01-25 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-01-21 0:00 ` robert_dewar [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox