From: Eoin@copse.demon.co.uk (Eoin Woods)
Subject: Re: Versions of SEI CMM
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 1994 13:33:47 +0000
Date: 1994-09-28T13:33:47+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <780759227snz@copse.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 369e08$an8@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM
In article <369e08$an8@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM "David Weller" writes:
> Yes, I believe there is. The new CMM will include negative numbers,
> to account for the practices of several large software houses,
> particularly those in the personal computer market. The holdup, it
> is rumored, is just _how many_ negative numbers to use. Given the
> state of practice in many American programming shops, the current
> value is at -18, but the final decision is on hold -- there appears
> to be some discussion about adding a few more values below that now
> that the findings from the Microsoft survey have come in.
>
> (Smiley should be contextually evident)
On this subject (of -ve CMM ratings!) I vaguely seem to remember a
humourous paper in (I think) Software Engineering Notes that presented
a new CMM with negative levels!
I can't find it now - does anyone know where it is??
Eoin.
--
Eoin Woods, LBMS Plc, Evelyn House, 62 Oxford Street, London W1N 9LF, UK
Tel: +44-71-636-4213 Email: Eoin@copse.demon.co.uk
Fax: +44-71-66-2708 or E.Woods@ieee.org
"When do we start newsgroup comp.os.emacs ? :-)"
These are my opinions - don't blame my employer for them!
prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-09-28 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <780669810snz@copse.demon.co.uk>
1994-09-27 15:33 ` Versions of SEI CMM David Weller
1994-09-28 13:33 ` Eoin Woods [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox