From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Future of Ada?
Date: 1999/01/13
Date: 1999-01-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77i9hq$mgu$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 369c6b78.7488219@news.nodak.edu
In article <369c6b78.7488219@news.nodak.edu>,
jamwahl@badlands.nodak.edu wrote:
> I am just wondering what those who frequent this news group think
> about the future of Ada. I've heard a lot of talk that Ada is kind of
> dying out and that not even the military is using it any more. Any
> comments would be greatly appreciated.
Our Military customer required it for the job I'm on now. Its a simulation job
too, not a "warfighting" job.
I tend to hear the most of that same "talk" from folks who (for some bizzare
reason) desparately *want* it to be true.
T.E.D.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-01-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-13 0:00 Future of Ada? Jim
1999-01-13 0:00 ` David Gillon
1999-01-13 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Jim
1999-01-13 0:00 ` dennison [this message]
1999-01-13 0:00 ` E. Robert Tisdale
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Jeff Schweiger
1999-01-13 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Jim
1999-01-13 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
[not found] ` <m3iuebji2a.fsf@fred.muc.de>
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Status of GNAT 3.11p Markus Kuhn
1999-01-15 0:00 ` dewar
1999-01-15 0:00 ` dewar
1999-01-16 0:00 ` Future of Ada? Kevin
1999-01-18 0:00 ` news.oxy.com
1999-01-19 0:00 ` Rush Kester
1999-01-19 0:00 ` Kirk
1999-01-19 0:00 ` Paul Whittington
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox