From: rodakay@internode.on.net
Cc: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Subject: Re: Gnat: broken dispatch tables for interface types ?
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 05:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-07-08T05:34:01-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77fa1487-e67d-4660-9073-f4edec4295bf@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19yhfqeqkm9kc$.fcax7yetctwy$.dlg@40tude.net>
On Sunday, 8 July 2012 16:53:30 UTC+10, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>
> Yes, of course. We are heavily using them in our projects.
Thank you Dmitry, that's most encouraging. It did seem unlikely that I could be the only person using interface types :). (Probably, I am the only person using them poorly, though ;) ).
>
> You should post a small example illustrating the case.
Yes, indeed. I will try to set up a minimal test case in the next day or so.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-08 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-08 3:02 Gnat: broken dispatch tables for interface types ? rodakay
2012-07-08 6:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-08 7:38 ` Jeffrey Carter
2012-07-08 8:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-08 12:34 ` rodakay [this message]
2012-07-09 6:53 ` rodakay
2012-07-09 7:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-09 7:46 ` Rod Kay
2012-07-09 9:37 ` Simon Wright
2012-07-09 9:49 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-09 17:32 ` Simon Wright
2012-07-09 18:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-13 15:58 ` Robert A Duff
2012-07-08 17:41 ` Vadim Godunko
2012-07-09 7:34 ` Rod Kay
2012-07-08 23:45 ` sbelmont700
2012-07-10 7:02 ` Rod Kay
2012-07-10 11:09 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox