From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ada commercial options
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2011-04-19T00:37:25-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77c9c293-9fd3-4f3b-a754-83bf3d3be487@p16g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: op.vt5c71iqlzeukk@jellix.jlfencey.com
On Apr 18, 8:49 pm, "Vinzent Hoefler"
<0439279208b62c95f1880bf0f8776...@t-domaingrabbing.de> wrote:
> > What commerical compilers for ada are available today. I know Gnats
> > available, are there any others still ?
>
> Yes.
>
> Out of my head [...]
Well, it is a bit confusing without specifying the language variant.
Obviously, outdated compilers are much less useful today, as they will
exclude not only modern programming idioms, but also entire modern
libraries.
Considering that we have 2011 now, it seems reasonable to ask for Ada
2005 compilers (I think so). Having this in mind it looks like there
is only one commercial compiler on the market.
--
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.msobczak.com * http://www.inspirel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-19 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-18 18:21 ada commercial options tonyg
2011-04-18 18:49 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2011-04-18 19:59 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-04-19 7:37 ` Maciej Sobczak [this message]
2011-04-20 23:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-04-21 6:18 ` Maciej Sobczak
2011-04-21 8:08 ` stefan-lucks
2011-04-21 9:37 ` Tero Koskinen
2011-04-21 19:58 ` Pascal Obry
2011-04-21 21:13 ` Georg Bauhaus
2011-04-21 21:19 ` Pascal Obry
2011-04-21 19:58 ` Pascal Obry
2011-04-21 23:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-04-22 5:55 ` Simon Wright
2011-04-23 0:50 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-04-21 20:16 ` Nicholas Collin Paul Gloucester
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox