From: choboy@calspan.com
Subject: GNAT Opinions
Date: 1998/12/23
Date: 1998-12-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75rj7i$2cq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
My company is currently considering converting a multi-program, multi-
processor, Solaris-based application (~800K lines of code) written in Verdix
Ada (SunAda3.0) to a "to be determined" Ada vendor. GNAT Ada95 is one of
these compilers under consideration. I'm looking for opinions from people
who may have used GNAT in a large-scale development effort such as ours or
perhaps did some trade studies that resulted in a GNAT go/no-go decision.
What were your experiences, good or bad? Why did you choose/not choose GNAT?
Would you choose GNAT if you had to do it all over again? If you paid for
and used the support from Ada Core Technologies, how was it? What kind of
development tools did you use, for example full-screen debuggers? The
answers to these and any other opinions you might have would be greatly
appreciated.
Bob Choboy
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next reply other threads:[~1998-12-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-12-23 0:00 choboy [this message]
1998-12-23 0:00 ` GNAT Opinions Bob
1998-12-24 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1998-12-25 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-12-27 0:00 ` endian-independent rep clauses (was Re: GNAT Opinions) Pat Rogers
1998-12-28 0:00 ` dewar
1998-12-26 0:00 ` GNAT Opinions Steven Hovater
1998-12-28 0:00 ` dewar
1999-01-04 0:00 ` Pascal MALAISE
1999-01-07 0:00 ` dewar
1999-01-07 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
1999-01-07 0:00 ` Michael F Brenner
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox