From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Bad influence of private part on what subprograms can be defined
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 03:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2017-10-09T03:19:51-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <759a1573-a766-4cb9-a8e6-0303f8eff368@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e75fde68-c47e-4cac-9299-c2bde6e57e95@googlegroups.com>
Place of implicit declaration corrected:
package B is
type B_Type is tagged private;
procedure Y (Object: B_Type);
private
type B_Type is new A.A_Type with null record;
--procedure X (Object: B_Type); implicitly defined here
end;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-09 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-08 22:52 Bad influence of private part on what subprograms can be defined Victor Porton
2017-10-09 7:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-10-09 9:25 ` AdaMagica
2017-10-09 10:19 ` AdaMagica [this message]
2017-10-09 22:02 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox