From: okellogg <okellogg@freenet.de>
Subject: Re: pragma Pack vs. Convention C, portability issue?
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:53:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2008-01-09T21:53:29-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75857910-720e-4f23-90d6-eb584e59466e@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3f729fc9-708f-49a5-82a5-b2d82038a47c@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com
On Jan 9, 5:06 pm, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
>
> for Perhaps_Packed'Component_Size use 2;
>
Yes, this is what I've been overlooking.
Many thanks
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-10 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-09 8:40 pragma Pack vs. Convention C, portability issue? okellogg
2008-01-09 16:06 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-01-09 22:12 ` Robert A Duff
2008-01-11 4:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-11 4:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-11 4:15 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-11 19:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-10 5:53 ` okellogg [this message]
2008-01-11 4:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-11 19:53 ` (see below)
2008-01-12 0:35 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-01-12 4:58 ` Randy Brukardt
2008-01-11 22:46 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox