From: Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@aol.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with limited with
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:08:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-07-26T18:08:45-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74eafc92-e3bb-4ce3-bae1-8b2e3430b60d@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ksv36l$tnc$1@dont-email.me>
On Friday, July 26, 2013 5:17:21 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> On 07/26/2013 03:17 PM, Adam Beneschan wrote:
>
> >
>
> > C'mon, people. It should be possible to ask a question about the language
> > rules by posting a reduced case, without getting comments about why the
> > poster didn't write his code a different way, or why the identifiers aren't
> > descriptive, or why a complete working example wasn't posted or something.
>
> It should be possible to post a reduced example that actually uses the feature
> that causes the problem.
As someone who often tries to answer (and sometimes asks) questions involving language rules, I only want to see the parts of the code that are relevant to the language-law question--even if that results in an example that (by itself) would be useless in real life. But adding other stuff just gets in the way.
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-27 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-26 19:14 Problem with limited with Simon Wright
2013-07-26 20:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-07-26 22:17 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-07-26 22:25 ` Shark8
2013-07-26 22:35 ` Simon Wright
2013-07-27 0:17 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-07-27 1:08 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2013-07-27 8:05 ` Simon Wright
2013-07-27 2:32 ` Shark8
2013-07-27 5:42 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-07-27 16:00 ` Shark8
2013-07-27 17:13 ` Jeffrey Carter
2013-07-27 19:21 ` Simon Wright
2013-07-28 2:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-07-27 3:55 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox