comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mccormick@cs.uni.edu
Subject: Re: C vs. ada for embeded system
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-03-09T09:02:32-07:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74c40d98-9150-4e5e-aab0-b0b28145cb0d@a12g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: gotp01$kbm$1@news.metronet.hr

On Mar 7, 7:23 am, "abcd" <a...@aa.com> wrote:
> why ada is better of  "C" language  for embeded system?

You can seee the results of completion rates for a 10-15K line project
done in both C and Ada in my Real-Time Embedded Systems class over the
past 20 years.  The class runs for one semester (15 weeks).  The
bottom line is that NO student team ever completed the minimal project
requirements in C.  Over 80% of the teams working in Ada complted the
project.  My latest publications on the matter are

We've been working on the railroad: a laboratory for real-time
embedded systems
McCormick, J. W.
SIGCSE Bulletin
Volume 37, Number 1, Feb. 2005, Page(s): 530-534.

Instrumentation education through model railroading
McCormick, J.W.
Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine, IEEE
Volume 9, Issue 5, Oct. 2006 Page(s): 40 - 45

Model Railroading and Computer Fundamentals
McCormick, J.W.
Journal of Computer Science Education
Volume 17, Number 2, June 2007 Page(s): 129 - 139



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-09 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-07 12:23 C vs. ada for embeded system abcd
2009-03-07 13:16 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-03-07 18:12 ` Martin
2009-03-07 18:18 ` Pascal Obry
2009-03-07 18:29 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2009-03-07 19:54 ` Per Sandberg
2009-03-07 23:26 ` anon
2009-03-08 10:43 ` Pascal Obry
2009-03-09 16:02 ` mccormick [this message]
2009-03-10 17:33   ` Martin Krischik
2009-03-11 10:14     ` christoph.grein
2009-03-11 14:07     ` John McCormick
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox