From: emwhede@emw.ericsson.se (Henrik Delin)
Subject: Re: Is Apex dead as an environment for Ada & Java?
Date: 1999/12/09
Date: 1999-12-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74S34.133$u4.14415@news.emw.ericsson.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 000b8d9b.8e8e4afb@usw-ex0107-042.remarq.com
In article <000b8d9b.8e8e4afb@usw-ex0107-042.remarq.com>,
jim_snead <basswoodNObaSPAM@my-deja.com.invalid> writes:
> My hypothesis is that using a single subsystem and then using
> multiple Apex "views" is all that is needed for a large Ada 95 project.
> It stands to reason that the concept of a subsystem is therefore
> unnecessary and outdated.
It is not the way it is intended. The views in a subsystem should be seen
as different views of the same bunch of code. Therefore it is not
possible to import views in the same subsystem. This would propably lead
to name clashes, since the same packages usually exist in both views.
A subsystem is a grouping that is the smallest part of an application
that can independently be frozen for releases. It gives a consistent way
of grouping Ada packages in larger groups, and keeping track of releases
of these groups of packages, especially when there are different versions.
/Henrik Delin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-26 0:00 Is Apex dead as an environment for Ada & Java? Tom_Hargraves
1999-11-26 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
1999-11-26 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
1999-12-12 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Henrik Delin [this message]
[not found] ` <01bf3857$22ca59a0$022a6282@dieppe>
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Ed Falis
[not found] ` <01bf38cc$04d205e0$022a6282@dieppe>
1999-11-27 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-18 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-11-26 0:00 jim_snead
1999-11-28 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-28 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-28 0:00 ` mike_zebrowski
1999-11-28 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-29 0:00 ` reason67
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` reason67
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-29 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-29 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-11-30 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-30 0:00 ` John Duncan
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Aidan Skinner
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-03 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-12-03 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-29 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
1999-12-01 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-09 0:00 ` Mark Hertel
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-11-30 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-11-30 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-01 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
1999-12-01 0:00 ` David W. Glessner
1999-12-01 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-12-02 0:00 ` jim_snead
1999-12-06 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-12-18 0:00 ` Steven Hovater
1999-12-02 0:00 ` Andreas Winckler
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox