From: dramirez@cs.uml.edu (Dr Amirez)
Subject: Re: the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid
Date: 1998/11/27
Date: 1998-11-28T00:27:25+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73ng1d$vc7$1@jupiter.cs.uml.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1998Nov27.163354.1@eisner
In article <1998Nov27.163354.1@eisner> Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam writes:
>In article <9eV62.403$Wj.3147@SnBeta>, "Pat Rogers" <progers@NOclasswideSPAM.com> writes:
>> partha sarathi panda wrote in message
>> <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>...
>>>can anyone convince me on why the Ada object-oriented model does
>> even
>>>compare with the tight c++ one?
>>
>>
>> Why is a person from Rational asking this question?
>
>Presumably for the same reason anyone from any company might.
>
>Did you think Rational was composed entirely of people devoted to Ada ?
>Perhaps the purpose of the post is to disabuse you of that notion :-)
>
>Larry Kilgallen
Grady Booch himself authored some C++ book, didn't he? :)
Dr Amirez
prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-11-27 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>
1998-11-25 0:00 ` the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid Richard D Riehle
1998-11-26 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1998-11-27 0:00 ` Jim Easterbrook
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Michael Stark
1998-11-25 0:00 ` dennison
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1998-11-27 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-11-27 0:00 ` Dr Amirez [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox