From: Richard D Riehle <LaoXhai@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid
Date: 1998/11/25
Date: 1998-11-25T14:17:11-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73hok7$s41@dfw-ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl
In article <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>,
"partha sarathi panda" <ppanda@rational.com> wrote:
>can anyone convince me on why the Ada object-oriented model does even
>compare with the tight c++ one?
>
"He convinced against his will is of the same opinion still."
"For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who
do not, no proof is acceptable."
I wish I had attributions for these quotes, but they seem to suit the
tone of the inquiry.
Richard Riehle
richard@adaworks.com
http://www.adaworks.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-11-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>
1998-11-25 0:00 ` the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid Pat Rogers
1998-11-27 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-11-27 0:00 ` Dr Amirez
1998-11-25 0:00 ` dennison
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Michael Stark
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle [this message]
1998-11-26 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1998-11-27 0:00 ` Jim Easterbrook
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox