From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid
Date: 1998/11/25
Date: 1998-11-25T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73h3g0$ptv$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl
In article <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>,
"partha sarathi panda" <ppanda@rational.com> wrote:
> can anyone convince me on why the Ada object-oriented model does even
> compare with the tight c++ one?
>
>
Perhaps you should join the thread ""Classes" as packages in Ada", already in
progress...
--
T.E.D.
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-11-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <01be184b$6c7cbac0$7a36e5c0@pearl>
1998-11-25 0:00 ` the Ada object oriented-approach is stupid Richard D Riehle
1998-11-26 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
1998-11-27 0:00 ` Jim Easterbrook
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Michael Stark
1998-11-25 0:00 ` dennison [this message]
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1998-11-27 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-11-27 0:00 ` Dr Amirez
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox