From: inga.miller@verizon.net
Subject: Re: Why I Say Ada is the Ideal Language for Cryptography.
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 11:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2013-12-23T11:33:20-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <720ca432-fa66-4cf4-89f0-595cccb0fdab@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e26bbe3b-9042-4a93-a6bf-92e7603cce3b@googlegroups.com>
On Monday, December 23, 2013 11:39:34 AM UTC-6, Austin Obyrne wrote:
> On Monday, December 23, 2013 3:37:08 PM UTC, inga....@verizon.net wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, December 22, 2013 7:54:34 AM UTC-6, Austin Obyrne wrote:
>
> I stand corrected - I should have said the US Departemet of Defense - the NSA own nothing to do with Ada - apologies to anybody who has taken offence.
>
> Austin
But even that is not true anymore. The DoD relinquished its trademark (serial number 73230945, applied for on 11 September 1979, granted 1 December 1981) on Ada as of 1 July 1988. DoD's Ada Joint Program Office was disbanded in September 1998: http://gcn.com/Articles/1998/06/22/Its-curtains-for-the-Ada-Joint-Program-Office.aspx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-23 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-22 13:54 Why I Say Ada is the Ideal Language for Cryptography Austin Obyrne
2013-12-22 18:15 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2013-12-23 15:37 ` inga.miller
2013-12-23 17:39 ` Austin Obyrne
2013-12-23 19:33 ` inga.miller [this message]
2013-12-24 0:23 ` Austin Obyrne
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox