Re: Ada 9X Mapping

[microsoft!jamesth@uunet.uu.net (James THIELE)]

In article <jls.671848656@rutabaga| jls@rutabaga.Rational.COM (Jim Showalter) writes:
In article <???| ??? writes:
|>     I have not seen any discussion on the Ada 9X draft Mapping Document in
|>this group.
|
|>Or does everyone thinks it perfect? 8-)
|
|Well, personally I think it's overkill. The current documents are in 
|a very sketchy state, and they are already large. By the time they
|are transmuted into real modifications to the LRM, the LRM will be
|twice as large as it already is.

Just what the world needs, an LRM twice as large!

Probably trying to stay more convoluted than C++. :-)

I like any number of features in Ada and C++, but the languages have
gotten too complex.  I'm somewhat relieved to be back to C.

James Thiele
Disclaimer:
Nobody on this group thinks that a C program written by a great C programmer
could be better than an Ada programm written by a lousy Ada programmer.
I do, I know you don't, so don't bother flaming me.