From: Olivier Henley <olivier.henley@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: protobuff for Ada
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2018 08:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2018-12-31T08:55:40-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <71d4373a-d8f7-448e-90cf-ea700c783030@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <q07ke7$855$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Interesting. I do not grasp the problem in full though...
When you say "Sorry to disappoint you in this festive time", do you mean trying a solution from ASN.1 or only trying at Protobuff?
I think I get why a Protobuff could not cover "complete" transfer of Ada types around, but how does other languages do? (Almost everyone has it) Some of these languages have relatively "complex" type system..?
How do they achieve it? They express any complex types with a limited subset of primitive types(string, int32, etc)?
Can you give a more pragmatic example that exemplifies the limitations in Ada?
Thx,
olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-31 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-28 18:57 protobuff for Ada Per Sandberg
2018-12-29 5:53 ` Shark8
2018-12-29 11:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-12-31 16:55 ` Olivier Henley [this message]
2018-12-31 17:59 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-01-01 14:56 ` Olivier Henley
2019-01-02 6:57 ` G. B.
2019-01-02 10:02 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-01-01 8:05 ` Per Sandberg
2019-01-01 15:04 ` Olivier Henley
2018-12-29 13:01 ` joakimds
2018-12-29 14:52 ` Per Sandberg
2018-12-30 0:27 ` joakimds
2018-12-30 0:28 ` joakimds
2018-12-30 6:21 ` Per Sandberg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox