From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Subject: Re: A hole in Ada type safety
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 07:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2011-05-10T07:39:04-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <715a5498-095c-4e61-8a09-8510c19b2553@s16g2000prf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: iqalsu$6nl$1@speranza.aioe.org
On May 9, 11:27 pm, a...@att.net wrote:
> Better look again!
>
> Even though a compiler emulates the "Unchecked_Conversion" with a built-in
> "pragma inline" being enforced. The function still must be able to be
> written in Ada.
No, it doesn't. Show me a rule in the RM that says it does. You
can't. There isn't one.
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-10 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-30 8:41 A hole in Ada type safety Florian Weimer
2011-04-30 11:56 ` Robert A Duff
2011-04-30 15:27 ` Gavino
2011-04-30 16:16 ` Florian Weimer
2011-04-30 23:39 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-05-01 10:26 ` Florian Weimer
2011-05-03 1:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-05-03 16:57 ` Robert A Duff
2011-05-07 9:09 ` Florian Weimer
2011-05-07 9:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-05-07 9:57 ` Florian Weimer
2011-05-08 8:08 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-05-08 8:46 ` Florian Weimer
2011-05-08 9:32 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-05-08 10:30 ` Florian Weimer
2011-05-08 20:24 ` anon
2011-05-08 21:11 ` Simon Wright
2011-05-10 6:27 ` anon
2011-05-10 14:39 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2011-05-11 20:39 ` anon
2011-05-12 0:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-05-13 0:47 ` anon
2011-05-13 0:58 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-05-13 5:31 ` AdaMagica
2011-05-12 5:51 ` AdaMagica
2011-05-12 12:09 ` Robert A Duff
2011-05-12 14:40 ` Adam Beneschan
2011-05-14 0:30 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-05-09 7:48 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-05-09 20:41 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-05-14 23:47 ` anon
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox