From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 )
Subject: Re: Ada & Posix
Date: 20 Nov 89 21:51:10 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7141@hubcap.clemson.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1412@cs.rit.edu
From mjl@cs.rit.edu:
> Actually, both Unix and Ada are products of the 1970's. The difference
> is that Unix, being primarily of commercial interest, has been able to
> evolve,
Thus generating the need for the POSIX effort. Ada, on the
other hand, standardized itself to start with. Furthermore,
its definition was frozen for ten years precisely in order to
provide vendors with the ability to amortize their investments
over that period of time. Ada has always had its portability,
whereas Unix is just now struggling to achieve it.
Now that Unix is finally standardizing, work is also in progress
(in the IEEE 1003.5 committee) to develop a standardized Ada binding
to the IEEE 1003.1 POSIX standard. From AlsyNews, September 1989:
Ada applications will have a major portability advantage
over C applications because Ada's strong typing will assure
that an application accesses only the services that are in
the POSIX packages. A C application might inadvertently mix
portable POSIX services with non-portable services provided
by the local operating system.
A full IEEE ballot on the Ada binding to POSIX is expected by year-end.
Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-11-20 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-11-14 21:24 A farewell to Ada Ted Holden
1989-11-14 22:54 ` schmidt
1989-11-15 16:06 ` Ada William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-15 16:29 ` Ada & IBM William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-17 15:16 ` ryer
1989-11-18 18:47 ` William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-20 4:53 ` Jerry Callen
1989-11-19 6:05 ` Dick Dunn
1989-11-22 19:20 ` William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-19 20:19 ` Liam R. E. Quin
1989-11-20 12:55 ` William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-25 23:35 ` Liam R. E. Quin
1989-11-26 9:03 ` Ken Ritchie
1989-11-15 23:18 ` Ada Promises Doug Schmidt
1989-11-16 22:45 ` Ada compilers William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-19 6:30 ` This has gotten stupid! Dick Dunn
1989-11-16 19:08 ` Ada Walter Rowe
1989-11-16 21:33 ` Ada William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-17 18:53 ` Ada Pablo Fernicola
1989-11-18 18:55 ` Ada William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-21 5:24 ` Ada Andrew Koenig
1989-11-22 9:54 ` Ada Mats Luthman
1989-11-22 18:44 ` Ada William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-23 9:44 ` Ada Mats Luthman
1989-11-23 7:12 ` Ada Markku Sakkinen
1989-11-21 14:35 ` Ada [and the object oriented metaphor] mjl
1989-11-22 20:54 ` Hoare, Ada, and safety/complexity John Goodenough
1989-11-24 0:38 ` Richard Pattis
1989-11-26 6:09 ` Ada vs. C++ Paul S. R. Chisholm
1989-11-18 6:38 ` Ada Marco S Hyman
1989-11-19 7:25 ` interesting statistic Dick Dunn
1989-11-22 18:54 ` William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-24 17:44 ` Cay Horstmann
1989-11-25 19:59 ` William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-17 15:59 ` Ada allows one-char names (was Re: Ada) Steve Frysinger of Blue Feather Farm
1989-11-19 5:52 ` Forward into the past Dick Dunn
1989-11-20 16:47 ` Ada vs. Posix -- the battle continues mjl
1989-11-20 21:51 ` William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 [this message]
1989-11-21 1:06 ` Ada & Posix William Thomas Wolfe, 2847
1989-11-15 18:55 ` A farewell to Ada Richard S D'Ippolito
1989-11-17 17:19 ` Michael Schwartz
[not found] <01bd3fe2$e3a76880$5d2c5c8b@aptiva>
1998-02-23 0:00 ` Ada & Posix Markus Kuhn
1998-02-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-02-23 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox