From: ndiamond@watdaisy.UUCP (Norman Diamond)
Subject: Re: ada certification question
Date: Mon, 18-Mar-85 13:20:06 EST [thread overview]
Date: Mon Mar 18 13:20:06 1985
Message-ID: <7080@watdaisy.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 333@wdl1.UUCP
> The AJPO does not seem to be a bottleneck here. In practice, compiler
> vendors seem to pass certification for the first time long before they have
> a usable product, since you can certify before you make your compiler either
> fast or user-friendly.
> John Nagle
Shouldn't this be posted to net.lang.fortran or net.lang.lisp?
After all, net.lang.ada is for fortran-vs-lisp debates.
--
Norman Diamond
UUCP: {decvax|utzoo|ihnp4|allegra}!watmath!watdaisy!ndiamond
CSNET: ndiamond%watdaisy@waterloo.csnet
ARPA: ndiamond%watdaisy%waterloo.csnet@csnet-relay.arpa
"Opinions are those of the keyboard, and do not reflect on me or higher-ups."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1985-03-18 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1985-03-14 1:15 ada certification question jbn
1985-03-18 18:20 ` Norman Diamond [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1985-03-05 18:12 Brian L. Kahn
1985-03-11 4:26 ` Stephen Tihor
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox