From: mfb@mbunix.mitre.org (Michael F Brenner)
Subject: Re: Filename for packages?
Date: 1998/10/05
Date: 1998-10-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6vb54k$1ru@top.mitre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6vaq03$rv5$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
> Indeed, we certainly expected an interest in the DOS version
> precisely because of this issue (generating applications that
> can run across Win 3.1/DOS, Win95, and NT) and that is indeed
> why we maintained and supported the DOS version for a while,
> but in fact no such interest every materialized. Not even one
> customer expressed interest in the DOS version for this purpose, which is
> why support was dropped.
Yes, that is true about those particular customers.
> The only interest that was ever shown was for
> students running old machines.
Please remember, that there are other categories of people who
expressed interest besides students and customers. If you don't
remember, I will volunteer that I am one of them.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-10-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-10-04 0:00 Filename for packages? Renwick Preston
1998-10-04 0:00 ` Chris Morgan
1998-10-04 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-10-05 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-10-05 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1998-10-05 0:00 ` dennison
1998-10-05 0:00 ` dewarr
1998-10-05 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
1998-10-05 0:00 ` Gautier.DeMontmollin
1998-10-05 0:00 ` dewar
1998-10-05 0:00 ` Michael F Brenner [this message]
1998-10-05 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk
1998-10-05 0:00 ` dennison
1998-10-05 0:00 ` dewarr
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox