From: Craig Carey <research@ada95.ijs.co.nz>
Subject: Re: GNAT and NT DLL; An Ada-Comment resignation
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 17:59:02 GMT
Date: 2002-01-09T17:59:02+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6u0p3u0qhm54mp88f4lmaqu2p59r8qtpa0@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uadvn4yi2.fsf@wanadoo.fr
On 09 Jan 2002 11:20:05 +0100, Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
>** <research@ada95.ijs.co.nz> writes:
>
>> MinGW executables are smaller than gcc executables. If gcc code
>
>There is a problem in this sentence. GCC uses MingW, so I don't understand
>what you mean ?
>
>There is 2 flavors of GCC on[e] based on Cygwin and one on MingW.
>
>Pascal.
I correct my statement, to say that Cygwin executables (not Gcc
executables) are larger. But that is just of the small number I
compared (not enough).
A Gcc file named configure.in (from cvs files), mentions both of
those two, so maybe the Cygwin code (with a -mno-cygwin) is not
"flaky" (which a Mingw Faq suggested).
--
Craig Carey
http://www.ijs.co.nz/ada_95.htm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-09 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-06 0:31 GNAT and a very foreign DLL Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
2002-01-07 16:19 ` Ted Dennison
2002-01-08 15:48 ` GNAT and NT DLL; An Ada-Comment resignation Vim Pine 44
2002-01-09 10:20 ` Pascal Obry
2002-01-09 17:59 ` Craig Carey [this message]
2002-01-10 2:10 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-12 18:01 ` Craig Carey
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox