From: dennison@telepath.com
Subject: Re: Abstract realizations can't be inherited??
Date: 1998/08/31
Date: 1998-08-31T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6se8fs$7lt$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EyGJID.858.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com
In article <EyGJID.858.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>,
stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) wrote:
> This sounds like a compiler bug. If a type is non-abstract, then by
> defintion all of its primitive procedures are non-abstract, even
> if an overriding is done in the private part.
>
> Time to file a bug report...
Awwww, again? :-)
I know I really should take Tucker's word for this, but I'd appreciate it if
someone would compile this example w/ a non-Aonix compiler and see if they get
an error. I'd hate to send in a bug report reading, "Tucker Taft says this is
wrong".
--
T.E.D.
-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/rg_mkgrp.xp Create Your Own Free Member Forum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-08-31 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-08-27 0:00 Abstract realizations can't be inherited?? dennison
1998-08-27 0:00 ` dewar
1998-08-27 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-08-28 0:00 ` dennison
1998-08-29 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-08-31 0:00 ` dennison [this message]
1998-08-31 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-08-31 0:00 ` dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox