From: "Corey Ashford" <corSPAMey@rational.com>
Subject: Re: ADA [sic] to C++
Date: 1998/07/17
Date: 1998-07-17T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6opfle$r8h$1@usenet.rational.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6ooev7$15d$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
modula2000@hotmail.com wrote in message <6ooev7$15d$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>...
>In article <35AE5645.22501E3D@yahoo.com>,
> Harsha N S <harsha_n_s@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Hi All !
>> I am now working on some ADA [sic] code which I need to convert to
>> C++. I am also ready to convert ADA [sic] to say X and then X to C++.
>
> I've never heard of a language called X.
>
Was that supposed to be funny?
Perhaps this sort of attitude has contributed to the tendency for
people to turn away from Ada.
No matter what, people are going to call it ADA. Let'em be. What
real difference does it make? Zip.
- Corey
prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-07-17 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-07-16 0:00 ADA to C++ Harsha N S
1998-07-17 0:00 ` ADA [sic] " modula2000
1998-07-17 0:00 ` Corey Ashford [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox