From: John McCabe <jgm@hayling.cwmbran.gecm.com>
Subject: Re: [Q] Task Types
Date: 1998/06/09
Date: 1998-06-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ljl1t$iic@gcsin3.geccs.gecm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EuAI6t.IBz.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com
stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) wrote:
>John McCabe (jgm@hayling.cwmbran.gecm.com) wrote:
>
>: Is there a means of providing an incomplete declaration of a Task type?
>
>Yes. An incomplete type declaration can be completed by *any*
>kind of type, including a task or protected type.
>
>Hence, the following is legal:
>
> type T;
> ....
>
> task type T is ...
>
Brilliant. I'll try that. The problem I was having was that I was trying
to use the syntax:
task type T;
:
:
task type T is.....
--
Best Regards
John McCabe
=====================================================================
Not necessarily my company or service providers opinions.
=====================================================================
prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-06-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-06-09 0:00 [Q] Task Types John McCabe
1998-06-09 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-06-09 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-06-09 0:00 ` John McCabe [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox