comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: campo@mailbox.difi.unipi.it
Subject: Re: future of proprietry source code (was: Ada generics are bad)
Date: 1998/04/17
Date: 1998-04-17T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6h7b30$5af$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3533DD6A.B2EB8D16@kla-tencor.com


In article <3533DD6A.B2EB8D16@kla-tencor.com>,
  David Masterson <David.Masterson@kla-tencor.com> wrote:

> Fah!  This is a smokescreen that should be obvious by now.  GPL'd
> software is not conducive to building a software development business
> around.  Over the years of watching the rise of the GNU Manifesto and
> GPL'd software, I've come to the following conclusions:

[snip]

GPL'd software leads to competition; hoarded software leads to monopolistic
practices.  It may be bad for a few (or just one :) giant\x12corporation, but
it can be much better for end users (I won't write "consumers") and for
smaller, dynamic enterprises.

[mega snip]

> The current interest in "free" software is largely due to a backlash
> against Microsoft.  If Microsoft succeeds in quelling this backlash,
> then the fervor for "free" software will die down (it won't go away) and
> so will the progress that GPL'd software is making.

The current *hype* in free software (a very recent phenomenon) may be due
to a backlash against Microsoft.  But the *interest* in free software has
a much deeper ground.  Now that complete, high-quality free software
systems are available and popular, they spread on their own merit; not
only technical merit, relying too much on hoardware *is* dangerous.

--
        Massimo Campostrini,
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa.

-----== Posted via Deja News, The Leader in Internet Discussion ==-----
http://www.dejanews.com/   Now offering spam-free web-based newsreading




  parent reply	other threads:[~1998-04-17  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-04-08  0:00 Ada generics are bad Glenden Lee
1998-04-08  0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-04-09  0:00 ` Anonymous
1998-04-10  0:00 ` Christopher Green
1998-04-10  0:00   ` Brian Rogoff
1998-04-11  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1998-04-13  0:00     ` Christopher Green
1998-04-13  0:00       ` Matthew Heaney
1998-04-13  0:00         ` nabbasi
1998-04-13  0:00           ` future of proprietry source code (was: Ada generics are bad) Fergus Henderson
1998-04-14  0:00             ` David Masterson
1998-04-16  0:00               ` David Kastrup
1998-04-16  0:00                 ` David Masterson
1998-04-17  0:00                   ` David Kastrup
1998-04-17  0:00               ` campo [this message]
1998-04-16  0:00             ` Tim Smith
1998-04-17  0:00               ` Thomas Bushnell, n/BSG
1998-04-18  0:00                 ` Bill Gribble
1998-04-20  0:00                   ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
1998-04-21  0:00             ` William Tanksley
1998-04-13  0:00         ` Ada generics are bad Christopher Green
1998-04-14  0:00         ` Robert Munck
1998-04-14  0:00           ` Matthew Heaney
1998-04-15  0:00           ` Jonathan Guthrie
1998-04-14  0:00         ` Al Christians
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox