From: "Alejandro R. Mosteo" <mosteo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: On intended use cases of the distributed annex
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 03:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2014-09-24T03:42:19-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e889da8-d5d9-4ab2-bee9-7f60751d7f62@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411553374.7751.25.camel@obry.net>
Thanks, Pascal and Tony. That sounds very encouraging, I will then certainly dig in into the details. That producer-consumer setup is like what I had in mind.
I guess the specific details of launching a set of processes in multiple machines will be compiler-dependent. In my case, I have (or could obtain) a list of IPs of machines I can access through ssh. If you have experience with gnat, could you briefly comment on this? Does one need to launch the process in every machine, or will a single command trigger a number of connections/executions?
Thanks again,
Álex.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-24 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-24 9:37 On intended use cases of the distributed annex Alejandro R. Mosteo
2014-09-24 10:08 ` tonyg
2014-09-24 10:09 ` tonyg
2014-09-24 10:09 ` Pascal Obry
2014-09-24 10:42 ` Alejandro R. Mosteo [this message]
2014-09-24 10:51 ` Alejandro R. Mosteo
2014-09-25 8:30 ` Maciej Sobczak
2014-09-25 9:26 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-09-25 14:36 ` Maciej Sobczak
2014-09-25 15:02 ` Brad Moore
2014-09-26 7:36 ` Maciej Sobczak
2014-09-30 5:44 ` Brad Moore
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox