From: Wilhelm Spickermann <quast.20.unbenutzbar@spamgourmet.com>
Subject: Re: Pragma Unreferenced in GNAT GPL 2008
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:29:34 +0200
Date: 2008-07-09T08:29:34+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6dj46eF2r37nU1@mid.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ruUbk.97809$102.21346@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
anon wrote:
> A quick patch is just to comment out the line. That way the
> file still maintains all original statements.
That won't help, as the pragma is already ignored. :-)
It's not a problem of getting things compiled -- it's just an
old "finger excercise" used to check the new compiler and I
wondered, if this new behaviour is to be expected.
Thanks,
Wilhelm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-09 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-05 5:26 Pragma Unreferenced in GNAT GPL 2008 Wilhelm Spickermann
2008-07-05 7:57 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-07-05 12:26 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
2008-07-05 12:51 ` Simon Wright
2008-07-09 6:37 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
2008-07-06 0:38 ` anon
2008-07-09 6:29 ` Wilhelm Spickermann [this message]
2008-07-08 8:28 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2008-07-09 6:06 ` Wilhelm Spickermann
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox