From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Object Ada (Aonix)
Date: 1998/03/02
Date: 1998-03-02T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6dedte$1ee$1@uuneo.neosoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 34FA2B79.FE54764@swbell.net
Bob Lusk wrote in message <34FA2B79.FE54764@swbell.net>...
>My personal opinion:
>Yes there are a number of bugs in ObjectAda. At my workplace, we tried
>using ObjectAda with limited success. Support is slow in helping with
>problems that surface.
>
>If you have a reasonably small program, you may be successful. If this
>is new code and not reused Ada 83 code you have a better chance.
>Debugger is flawed - You may have to debug with print statements.
>
>Have you considered either Rational or Green Hills? Is your application
>real-time?
IMHO there is no better front end than that used by Aonix (ie the
Intermetrics front end) which if I remember correctly is the same one used
by Green Hills. It routinely handles correct code that other compilers
cannot. This doesn't mean that you are wrong, YMMV, just that the Aonix
product is pretty darn good all things considered, particularly -- for me --
in handling complex code.
Yes the debugger isn't really ready yet, but they are indeed working on it.
Pat Rogers
no relation to Aonix other than a user
prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-03-02 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-02-12 0:00 Object Ada (Aonix) Dominique Bouthinon
1998-02-12 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-02-13 0:00 ` Dominique Bouthinon
1998-03-01 0:00 ` Bob Lusk
1998-03-02 0:00 ` Pat Rogers [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox