From: topmind <topmind@technologist.com>
Subject: Re: Am I "Overqualified"?
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2008-01-30T13:43:43-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6db9b650-92c9-4237-8c37-bf9e7fcc75be@i7g2000prf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: d91db3d5-4a34-4ec7-bda1-a6ecb770b0f0@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com
On Jan 30, 1:21 pm, Ed Berard <ed.ber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Howdy Folks,
>
> It seems that lately, I have been turned down for an increasing number
> of assignments, because I am "overqualified."
>
> I have been doing a good deal of "architecture tasks," as in:
>
> * product architecture
>
> * product line architectures
>
> * process architectures.
>
> I do tend towards the more formal "C&C" viewpoints. However, I don't
> think that this has much to do with my problem.
>
> If you want, you can chck my resume at the bottom of our home
> page:
>
> http://www.toa.com
>
> Any constructive feedback would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- Ed
That's a code-word for "too old" or "too expensive". Time to lie.
Welcome to IT in Amerika.
-T-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-30 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-30 21:21 Am I "Overqualified"? Ed Berard
2008-01-30 21:43 ` topmind [this message]
2008-01-31 8:21 ` apm35
2008-01-31 16:45 ` topmind
2008-02-01 14:39 ` KarlNyberg
2008-01-30 22:10 ` Gautier
2008-01-30 22:26 ` Ludovic Brenta
2008-01-31 2:11 ` Phlip
2008-01-31 0:07 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2008-01-31 16:38 ` Ed Berard
2008-01-31 0:45 ` Tom
2008-02-01 15:28 ` Michael Bolton
2008-02-01 17:08 ` xpyttl
2008-02-01 18:14 ` Ed Berard
2008-02-01 19:29 ` Phlip
2008-02-01 21:07 ` Martin Vuille
2008-02-03 8:07 ` kevin cline
2008-02-04 7:17 ` apm35
2008-02-04 12:33 ` Phlip
2008-02-04 14:58 ` strazzerj
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox