From: qunying <zhu.qunying@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ada binding to GMP and MPFR
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-05-29T10:08:33-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ce38a5b-8025-4417-accd-b678b54dbd5b@q14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: f048e5cb-2ade-4716-a2d2-8022eaa51473@v2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com
Just some thought, it is mostly personal style taste. For mpfr.ads/
gmp.ads, you are using a style of gathering all pragma Import /
Convention statements into one place. Does moving those part more
close to the declaration itself make maintenance more easy?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-29 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-20 14:19 Ada binding to GMP and MPFR vincent.diemunsch
2009-05-20 14:30 ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-05-20 15:24 ` qunying
2009-05-27 15:35 ` vincent.diemunsch
2009-05-27 17:47 ` John B. Matthews
2009-05-28 12:47 ` vincent.diemunsch
2009-05-28 19:41 ` John B. Matthews
2009-05-28 20:23 ` vincent.diemunsch
2009-05-29 0:30 ` John B. Matthews
2009-05-29 12:01 ` vincent.diemunsch
2009-05-29 17:08 ` qunying [this message]
2009-05-29 16:55 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox