From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: cobegin ... coend
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 03:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2017-07-01T03:47:59-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c484b20-6225-4fd0-b21a-5cf9f0651c17@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <oj7hos$4p8$1@dont-email.me>
On Saturday, 1 July 2017 08:12:01 UTC+1, G.B. wrote:
> A chapter about concurrent processes an older book
> introduces the notation
> *cobegin* S1; S2; ...; Sn *coend*.
Concurrent Pascal?
> The second "process" between *cobegin* and *coend* seemed trickier,
> as the surrounding control structure depends on the process's result,
> i.e., on variable Completed having been set in time. So, the loop
> needs to wait for another rendezvous, for example.
>
> Are such things planned for Ada 2X's new parallel features?
Yes, parallel blocks and loops.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-01 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-01 7:11 cobegin ... coend G.B.
2017-07-01 10:47 ` Lucretia [this message]
2017-07-03 0:17 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox