comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: rlove@antispam.neosoft.com (Robert B. Love )
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.10p and GCC 2.7.2.3
Date: 1998/02/10
Date: 1998-02-10T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6bo8ef$dg9$1@uuneo.neosoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87ra5f1pm6.fsf@darkstar.maison


In <87ra5f1pm6.fsf@darkstar.maison> Jean-Francois Vilarem wrote:
> rlove@antispam.neosoft.com (Robert B. Love ) writes:
> 
> > I've just upgraded my Linux to RedHat 5 and seem to have lost my
> > ability to compile.  I believe that my gcc got upgraded to 2.7.2.3.
> > What gcc was gnat-3.10p built with?  Is there a compatibility problem
> > with it and the newer gcc?
> Binaries from gnat-3.10p.....tar.gz are built using gcc-2.7.2.1 and 
libc.so.5
> This installation overwrite /usr/bin/gcc and does not work.
> 
> I have found a dirty trick :  use the package gnat-3.10 from 
debian/hamm/devel
> This package is compiled with glibc2.0, gcc-2.7.2.3 and does not divert 
gcc.
 
[ procedure deleted ]

I followed it and sure enough I can now compile.  However, the
program core dumps when I try to execute it. 

Will ACT build GNAT 3.10p with gcc 2.7.2.3?  If I get the source,
how difficult is it to do yourself?

----------------------------------------------------------------
 Bob Love                                   MIME & NeXT Mail OK
 rlove@neosoft.com                            PGP key available
----------------------------------------------------------------





  reply	other threads:[~1998-02-10  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-02-07  0:00 GNAT 3.10p and GCC 2.7.2.3 Robert B. Love 
1998-02-07  0:00 ` Jean-Francois Vilarem
1998-02-10  0:00   ` Robert B. Love  [this message]
1998-02-08  0:00 ` Michael Appleby
1998-02-08  0:00   ` bklungle
1998-02-09  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox